Breaking News

Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - 2:55pm
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - 2:41pm
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - 2:23pm
Tuesday, January 27, 2015 - 1:02pm

Attorney General Abbott leads multi-state coalition in defense of prayer

Attorney General Abbott leads multi-state coalition in defense of prayer

POSTED: Thursday, July 8, 2010 - 2:29pm

UPDATED: Friday, July 9, 2010 - 9:22pm

AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott leading a multi-state coalition of 29 attorneys general today took legal action to defend the annual National Day of Prayer. An amicus brief authored by Attorney General Abbott urges the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit to overturn a lower court ruling, which held that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional.

The National Day of Prayer statute was established by Congress in 1952. Since then, presidents have issued proclamations that designate a single day each year as the National Day of Prayer. In 2008, the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a Wisconsin-based group of atheists and agnostics, filed a lawsuit claiming that the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional. On April 15, 2010, U.S. District Judge Barbara Crabb issued a decision ruling that the National Day of Prayer violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause, which provides: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion.”

In the amicus brief filed today, the states argue that public acknowledgments of God at official functions have been customary since the nation’s founding: “Invocations have opened presidential administrations, legislative sessions, and judicial proceedings throughout our Nation’s history.” The states’ brief also argues that the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that governmental institutions’ public acknowledgments of God are constitutional. In a 1983 case styled Marsh v. Chambers, for example, the high court upheld the constitutionality of state and federal governments opening every legislative session with a clergy-led prayer.

The states explain that the district court’s decision not only strikes down the National Day of Prayer, but also threatens Memorial Day. The federal law establishing Memorial Day requests that the president issue a proclamation “calling on the people of the United States to observe Memorial Day by praying, according to their individual religious faith, for permanent peace.” The states explain that “if the district court is correct, and Congress may not enact laws that require the president to issue a proclamation inviting those who wish to pray to do so, then the statute providing for the observance of Memorial Day would presumably be unconstitutional as well.”

Finally, the states argue that the ruling of the federal district court in Wisconsin also threatens the states’ own traditions of issuing prayer proclamations. For example, the brief notes that Gulf coast state officials designated Sunday, June 27, a day of prayer due to the recent oil spill. The states argue that if the National Day of Prayer is unconstitutional, “the actions of the governors of all fifty States will likewise be called into doubt, for doing nothing more than acknowledging our Nation’s religious heritage, consistent with our Nation’s customs and traditions.”

Comments News Comments

Why isn't Abbott picking up the case of the illegal out of state contrabutions to the Green Party? Could it be because it has already been proven it was a contrabution from the Republican Party? Abbott took an OATH to uphold the law no matter who is involved, GUESS HE IS CORRUPT TOO!

he probably is...just like every other politician out,democrat,etc etc etc...

There are two reasons for someone to support the green party, which you seem to conceed is communistic. One, you support their ideals. Second, because their candidate would take votes away from your Democratic opponant. If the Republicans have contributed to the green party, I'm pretty sure why.

Either way it just shows everyone how low and sorry the Republican & Green Parties are to violate the law . Anyone who supports that kind of behavior is no better than any child molester in prison.

"The purpose of the First Amendment was "to exclude from the national government all power to act on the subject...of religion." The First Amendment, therefore, provides freedom for religion, not from religion. The states by the amendment were afforded that freedom in the area of religion." Constitionnal Law Authority Edward S. Corwin

Judge Crabb is ruling what she desires and not from the rights of the people guaranteed in the Constitution.

America needs prayer now.

Well, now that he's got that all fixed up, perhaps he can get on with his job.

Post new Comment