Gun makers sound off on gun control debate

News

POSTED: Sunday, January 27, 2013 - 7:27pm

UPDATED: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 - 11:47am

Gun makers say any type of assault weapons ban proposal could all but kill their industry and it would impact people across the country.

Will Hayden owns Red Jacket Firearms in Baton Rouge. He believes any type of ban will hurt the industry.

“The bread and butter of the entire weapons industry are being flushed away - kicked to the wayside,” he said.

Hayden believes it could leave behind disastrous results. That could mean hundreds, even thousands across the country out of work, and one of America’s few manufacturing industries paralyzed.

Joe Meaux is the operations manager of Red Jacket. He told NBC33 News the proposal is a knee jerk reaction to what happened in Newtown, Connecticut.

“A lot of what this assault weapons bans is being based on emotion - working on peoples emotion,” he said.

He doesn’t think it will solve the gun problems that lead to mass shootings.

“If somebody wants to do something, murder’s already illegal, theft is illegal, stealing guns is already illegal; what more can we do to make it illegal?”

Hayden says there's a balance between keeping AR-15's out of the wrong hands, while not hurting the entire gun industry. But he says people aren't racing to find that balance. He worries a rush to judgment will leave his workers without a paycheck.

“I would take the emotion and politics completely out of it,” he said.

Hayden wants lawmakers, even the President, to address what he says the real problem, which he says is the people behind the gun.

“To me, it’s so basic. I feel like an idiot even saying it. How can you blame an inanimate object for the actions of a criminally insane individual?”

A though he says is falling on deaf ears and the results could be a big step backward for the nations economy.

One of the President's proposals includes universal background checks. That means criminal and mental background checks before a gun is sold.

Any changes to gun control legislation have to be approved by congress in Washington, D.C.
Comments

Comments News Comments

Okay, chuck...I give up...I am probably the most color-blind person you could ever know...I quit...you are getting way to verbally frightening, so I'm signing off...again...maybe I've learned the lesson that free speech is not allowed in ET. I quit!

Thia administration wont enforce the Laws on the books now, (selectively of course) is any new law going to reduce the crime in Chicago or D.C.?

People just need to have to realize that the people who come into your house at night are going to have these banned firearms. they dont care. its like insurance you dont need it till its not there.

It's not a matter of need. It's a matter of our Constitution. What part of "Shal NOT Be Infringed" do you not yet understand? And yeah, they DO want your guns, ammo & all that is associated with them. The UN countries are crying that the U.S. has an unfair advantage by allowing its citizens to own & use guns.

REPUBLICANS / T-PARTIERS ALL THINK THAT MONEY IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN LIFE ITSELF.
THEY ARE ALL HYPOCRITS THAT CLAIM TO BE CHRISTIANS BECAUSE THEY GO TO A CHRISTIAN CHURCH BUT THEY WORSHIP MONEY MORE THAN JESUS CHRIST.

It is not the number of bullets someone has, it is the attitude of the person pulling the trigger that matters ! Timothy McVeigh didn't use one bullet and he killed 19 kids under the age of 6, 149 adults, and injured 680 more ! But you didn't hear a out cry to ban large rental trucks, diesel, or fertilizer ! If a crazy is going to kill they will find away to do so, and they really don't care about any law that says they can't have what they need to do the deed ! If they can't find a 30 rou

And even today such rifles as the AR-15 make excellent home defense guns. The 5.56mm JHP rounds will not pass through a sheetrock wall (which shotgun and handgun ammunition will) and a 30 round magazine makes it where you do not have to reload (reloading takes time and in the dark it's rather hard.) Also many people cannot take the recoil of a shotgun so semi-automatics with large magazine capacities make sense.

So these rifles have their place. And the 2nd Amendment says we keep them.

They don't want 'all' your guns (for now.) If they pass the idea then can ban semi-automatic rifles and magazines more than 10 rounds then what is to stop them later from banning ALL semi-automatic rifles? U.K did just that.

The 2nd Amendment is NOT ABOUT DUCK HUNTING. The Militias of the age when the amendment was written did use just what small arms the military used. And thus civilians should have the same ability least the government one day decides the other Amendments are unnecessary.

hayden is a liar and an opportunist...his bottom line is all that matters to him...to say banning assault weapons/mega-round clips will "kill the industry" makes this clown a bottom feeder unable and unwilling to do the right thing...part of the war on sensibility, this jerk falls right in line with those who are full of hate and fear...NO ONE WANTS ALL YOUR GUNS...BAN ASSAULT WEAPONS/MEGA-ROUND CLIPS...you don't need them in your arsenal...they belong in the hands of military personnel.

When was the last time congress passed a law limiting only one thing like 30 round clips? Better yet when was the last time they didn't use that law to strip away more of our freedoms,or spend more of our money on pork, in the noble cause of protecting us ! Lastly when was the last time passing a law actually stopped a criminal from doing what they wanted to do ? If passing a law was all it took, this country would be crime free !

This Country has had a growing attitude problem since the Government took The Ten Commandments out of our schools ! People young and old are no longer given a standard to live by or taught how to know right from wrong !
The best deterrent would be to apply a minimum automatic 5 year prison term to anyone using a gun, of any kind, in the commission of a crime, and the death penalty if it results in death or permanent disability ! Double that 5 year term for anyone harming a Emergency Respo

Snydergal, the anti-white racist, does not understand that some people make a living without taking a government paycheck. That this man's livlihood is threatened by a ban that has already been tried and proved ineffective is of no concern to her, she is the typical affirmative hire brainwashed by government stooge. Like Obammy, Snydergal tells us what we need and don't need.

Post new Comment