Neal Barton's POV

Let's hear both sides of the argument


POSTED: Friday, May 16, 2014 - 6:15pm

UPDATED: Wednesday, May 28, 2014 - 9:19am

This will get things stirred up again.

The Mail online's Ben Spencer wrote recently:

A scientific study which suggests global warming has been exaggerated was rejected by a respected journal because it might fuel climate skepticism, it was claimed last night.

The alarming intervention, which raises fears of 'McCarthyist' pressure for environmental scientists to conform, came after a reviewer said the research was 'less than helpful' to the climate cause.

Professor Lennart Bengtsson, a research fellow at the University of Reading and one of five authors of the study, said he suspected that intolerance of dissenting views on climate science was preventing his paper from being published.

'The problem we now have in the climate community is that some scientists are mixing up their scientific role with that of a climate activist,' he told the Times.

Prof Bengtsson's paper suggests that the Earth's environment might be much less sensitive to greenhouse gases than previously thought.

Exactly, I've said this all along. This have gone from scientific discussion to activism.

If you don't believe like we do that the Earth is being destroyed by man-made global warming, you don't have a right to speak, which is ridiculous.

That's my point of view, what's yours?

You can email me at or Facebook me at KETK Neal Barton

Comments News Comments

Bunch of News Flashes!

Confused Kerry Flubs Temp Data in Climate Speech...

Infamous 'global cooling' author now insists Earth was warming all along...

Obama Admits Chicago Winter Makes It Hard To Sell...

SPIEGEL: Climate Scientists Forced to Toe Line?

The 'global warming/cooling' shtick is just as transparent as Obama.

News flash!

The University of Queensland in Australia is suing to block the release of data used by one of its scientists to come up with the oft-quoted statistic that 97 percent of climate scientists agree that mankind is causing global warming.

Yes they REFUSE to tell you how this '97 percent' 'consensus' in any shape or form. Turns out only 41 out of the 11,944 published climate studies examined by Cook explicitly stated that mankind caused most of the warming since 1950, i.e. just 0.3 %!

Off the subject again, deaf... go to the Hell you have created in your own mind and spare civilized people the pain of reading your garbage.

News flash!! Democratic Florida Rep. Joe Garcia said, “And two of the safest cities in America, two of them are on the border with Mexico,” Garcia continued. “And of course, the reason is we’ve proved that Communism works. If you give everybody a good government job, there’s no crime.”

Yes Democrats are closet communist. And that is why in 2014 we need to vote every one of them out. They help Obama with his VA slow code kill list of veterans while pushing a communist plan via 'global warming'.


All you have to do is read town idiot's comments on any subject and you will quickly come to the conclusion that he hates Texas and Texans. He hates conservatives, the constitution, the second amendment, God, Country, Guns and anyone and anything that does not agree with him. He is truly a town idiot. His biggest problem is that he is out numbered and out voted and he knows that his liberal views have no place in Texas. Go get em Ted Cruz and Louie Gohmert.

Town Idiot,
You know, I've voting as an independent all my life, never conforming nor wishing to conform to any political party but you racist liberal comments towards the republicans in general and the Tea party in particular made me make a firm decision to vote against all democrats and against almost all incumbents. It is liberals like you who ignore our laws and our constitution and RHINO's like Mccain and Boehmer who are ruining this country.

News flash.. Sec. of State Kerry says... If Wrong on Climate Change, 'What's Worst That Can Happen?'

What is the worst? The whole world economy going down the tubes. Mass starvation due to the destruction of the economy. Mass unemployment. WAR.

And that is just a few of the thing that will happen if they totally re-arrange the economy of the world.

But Kerry has 200 million dollars due to his wife being who she is. So what would he care.

The whole point pete IS debate. Proof is needed and the proof must be check to make sure there is no fakery like before.

You are ASSUMING the Global Warmest are correct and taking at face value what they say is the truth, even when they are exposed to having lied and suppressed any thought but their own.

And then you give this chicken-little 'wait till the sky falls and I was right' shtick.

So no, pete, we need debate. We need solid proof that can be studied by all and shown to be correct.

Okay... the debate is suspended until we see what happens in the future, until we see seas rising, accelerated polar ice melting, 21st century dust bowls start, etc. Let's just try to live long enough to see if what humans are doing to the planet now affects the lives of our children's children. Keep on polluting and denying and just wait....don't do anything to mitigate the effects of foul air, water, soil... see if the earth can continue to produce enough for future generations to eat.

Keep in mind idiot, there are "fringe groups" at both ends of the extreme.

Only question is, why did the 'global warmest' lie about their data, send emails to each other telling them to lie about the data, and then try to suppress any publication of data that contradicts their ideas of what is happening.

See those people who deign there is a 'climate change' going on have not lied about their data, have not sent emails to each other to lie, and are quite happy to debate the facts.

Professor Lennart Bengtsson is a Swedish meteorologist. He was Head of Research at the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts from 1975 to 1981 and then Director until 1990; then director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg. He is now a Senior Research Fellow at the Environmental Systems Science Centre in the University of Reading. Four other scientist published the paper with him.

He isn't a nut. He is a scientist what a valid view that is being suppressed.

I'm glad you identify yourself correctly as "Townidiot" cause you are. How does a guy with a social science background know sic-em from come-here about the veracity of what government has made no secret of being a revenue stream for world wealth redistribution. You are the terrorist in this nation, you and your kind too stupid to see how you are being manipulated , so full of propaganda that you actually believe what is impossible to determine, sickly praying for a disaster to say I told you so

It's sad the Global Warming fanatics first fudged the data all across the world and then sent emails telling all their 'scientist' to gin up the results cause they didn't follow the 'hockey stick' computer simulation. Now that's a fact and was exposed several years ago.

And now they try to keep a scientist whose study contradicts their supposed computer models from even publishing his works.

That's just another expose of their so-called science, and their science is not settled.

you're a Kook

Are you looking in the mirror again and typing to yourself snyderpal?????

Post new Comment