ADVERTISMENT
Golden State voters eyeing "Sin Tax" on smokes

POSTED: Monday, June 4, 2012 - 7:20am
UPDATED: Tuesday, June 5, 2012 - 6:30pm
East Texans talk-back on idea of "Sin Tax" to KTBB's Garth Maier
Tyler — Health and anticancer groups rallied behind a ballot initiative to impose a new $1-a-pack cigarette tax to finance cancer research in california.
That provoked a $47 million storm of advertisements, overwhelmingly financed by the tobacco industry, which is outspending proponents by nearly four to one to defeat the biggest threat it has faced in California in more than a decade.
East Texans talk-back on sin taxes with our news partner: KTBB and host Garth Maier.
Comments News Comments
Texas has raised the "sin" tax on tobacco products twice in the past 4 years to "cover health related issues associated with tobacco" because tobacco drives up the cost of health care. Wonder why health care hasn't gone down and where that tax money is? Obesity causes more health problems and health care cost to sore even more than tobacco products. Guess we need a "sin tax" on food when obese people buy groceries too. Just put a scale and hight measurment device at every check out counter.
"When buying and selling are controlled by legislation, the first things to be bought and sold are legislators." -P.J. O'Rourke
The liberals in CA are frustratingly inconsistent. Isn't this the same group advocating the personal liberty to marry who they wish and to smoke pot? I don't understand how they miss this point - the more the government chooses for us, the less we can decide for ourselves.
Using the government to encourage or discourage a peaceful, voluntary behavior is improper and will undoubtedly backfire. The more power we surrender to the government, the more corrupt it becomes.
Once it passes, let's all get behind Californians and encourage them to smoke so that they have enough money to do the research! Rah! Rah! Rah! Get smoking California and save the lives of cancer patients.













