Wednesday, May 22, 2013 - 2:52am
Talkback
Grading the president on 2nd debate
6 Comments
POSTED: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 - 7:16am
UPDATED: Friday, October 19, 2012 - 2:10pm
East Texans talk-back on President Obama's second debate performance
Tyler — Both sides of the aisle would agree; Mitt Romney bested the president in their first debate. Last night in New York, at a "Town Hall" style second debate, East Texans were asked to grade the president's performance.
They talk-back to our news partner: KTBB and host Garth Maier.
Comments News Comments
ACCORDING TO ALL OF THE NON PARTISAN FACT CHECKERS OBAMA TOLD THE TRUTH MORE THAN ROMNEY. THAT MAKS ROMNEY A BIGGER LIAR THAN OBAMA.
Mindless East Texans back willard the liar, panderer, warmonger, elitist, property of the likes of Koch brothers/mega-wealthy corporate donors/special interest groups, protector of the 1%, showing disdain for the "common people", clueless about the middle class struggle, outsourcer-in-chief of American jobs, and did I already say liar? You will all pay dearly with a downsized lifestyle with your vote for willard. Pres. Obama will shred willard 2 more times...next debate and on Nov. 6th!!
Although women do not vote as a monlithic group, the "binder full of women" comment does not help Romney. Women were invisible to him at Bain and in Mass. Women are going to pick up on that. Anyone remember when GW Bush passed the third term abortion bill, nd the photo op showed him surrounded by men and only men, smiling, laughing and backslapping each other like they had just won the rugby game?? Republican men seem to have a hard time understanding that is unaccepable to women.
Mitt needs to realilize that it seems, americans are watching the body language more than listening to what is being said and qbama is the master of deceat, a professional lier! On at least two occasions last night obama out and out lied while looking arrows at Romney. It seems too that these women moderators that can't stay out of the debate should be disqualified and a replacement be put in immediately, hopefully to the disqualified's great embarracement.
Mitt was a disappointment. He had a chance to build on the first debate and failed. Obama was more aggressive and made a better case for his position. He's still off base, but he did better. The moderator favored Obama heavily, but I don't think anything would have changed if she wasn't.
Could be about Obama; the only thing is he did NOT tell the truth 6 times.
Does that count??
Mitt did tell the truth.The moderator inturrupted Mit many times. Not Obama...in fact she took Obama's side on another untruth.
She acted more like an umpire not a unbiased moderator. ...even like a 3rd debator.
Obama was floundering around , yelling ,scolding, finger pointing, 'uh', "ah" going over his time. He did not act like a gentleman.I basically am sad that Obama represents ME to foreigners.
Post new Comment
ADVERTISMENT
Special Features
Special Reports
