UPDATE: No pipeline in my back yard!

News

POSTED: Monday, September 27, 2010 - 10:17pm

UPDATED: Thursday, September 30, 2010 - 8:40pm

Last week you met some angry landowners in Wood County who are in the path of a proposed oil pipeline from Canada.
 

A new citizens groups called S.T.O.P. or Stop the Tarsands Oil Pipeline, was organized in Winnsboro.

Landowners who don’t want a pipeline under their property have vowed to fight it.
 

The pipeline company says, many of their fears are unfounded. But as we have learned, ultimately, it may not matter…
 

The Keystone Pipeline is already underway in the northern part of the country, and the legs through Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas are the last legs of the project to bring oil from the Canadian Oilsands.
 

“This is a pipeline project that will expand our relationship with a reliable, dependable and abundant source of oil,” says James Prescott of TransCanada. “Canada is our largest oil export country by far, it’s not even close.”
 

It’s not really oil as we know it, but a semi-solid that must be mixed with other chemicals to be fluid enough to be piped, and that is one worry the landowners have.
 

“What’s in the pipeline, no we don’t mix it with a lot of chemicals,” said Prescott. “Let’s talk about that. Let’s have that discussion. Now you’re getting into some fairly detailed stuff, and I’d be happy to provide you with that information. It’s not secret. We’re unbelievably forthcoming on this project.”
 

Prescott later called and said they add diluents. That is a process for diluting this thick, immovable material.

He would not explain what is in it. But we found out.
 

For oilsands they use a compound called Dilbit. It’s 50% naphtha. Naphtha is volatile, explosive. It is where we get the letters N-A-P in the word Napalm.
 

“We understand the sensitive nature of the business we’re in,” Prescott maintained. “That’s why we take it very seriously.”
 

The other concern is that TransCanada, has the power of eminent domain. That’s because in Texas, an oil or gas pipeline is considered a community benefit like a highway or a park.
 

“It’s a tool of last resort,” he assured us. “It’s not a perfect world, but we do the best that we can. And if a landowner disagrees, we’ll see if we can work it out. That’s why it’s a negotiation.”
 

Prescott says the overwhelming majority of landowners have accepted TransCanada’s offer for an easement. But to be fair, there’s not much choice in the end.
 

TransCanada has submitted an Environmental Impact Statement that the EPA says is inadequate.
 

But Prescott told us he expects that to be cleared up and the Presidential permit to be issued next year.
 

Comments News Comments

So where’s Bill White on this pipeline abuse? He ran an ad against Perry and his I69 eminent domain land grab? This ought to be more fodder to throw in the wind. Or, this Lake Columbia. Is everybody willing to give up land for water? Where’s Bill White’s voice for the people who don’t want to leave their land. ‘course, Bill’s a business man, from Houston, the pipe is going that way. My family was eminently evicted from our domain to build Martin Lake near Tatum. All for the good of the community

Dare to search out the answers about tar sands and the pipelines that carry the toxic mess. Use your search engine, key in tar sands and begin to read the truth. If this is not possible just think "BP on LAND" and you'll begin to understand the drive to get all the dollars possible with no regard for lives, land, water or air. This pipeline only offers dangerous exposure along its length and hugely increased amounts of toxins at the refineries. It's dirty oil and dirty business.

I challenge those of you who believe the pipeline is safe to put your lives where your mouths are. Let the EPA set up testing facilities on your lawn. They can wrap a pipeline around your home and pump identical materials through it at high pressure, using the exact same oversight measures that will be used on this pipeline. You live there with your families right by that pipeline for at least 10 years. If everything goes well then you will have hard proof that it's safe. What's wrong? Afraid?

We can not believe what TC says blindly. They are in this business for the profit it can provide. Since we will not see any revenue from this project, why do we have it running through our back yards? STOP this pipeline.

Prescott say's what is in the pipeline is not secret. "We are unbelievably forthcoming." This is not consistent with other spokesmen who say, no emergency response plan will be released and no information will be given on concerns of national security, landowner privacy, and that the contents are considered proprietary. Maybe this is an example of the confusion and misdirection that is the result of "Deceptive Trade Practices." False, misleading, or deceptive acts are declared unlawful in Texas.

1) If "eminent domain is a tool of last resort", then why does TransCanada threaten to use eminent domain prior to negotiations?
2) Rogue government agency or not, the EPA still has authority.
3) How many refinery jobs will Texans get that will be more important than the lives, water, air, property rights, etc. of the thousands of landowners who will have their hard earned land destroyed and not put back?
4) "It's our risk, not theirs." Again, a demonstration that our concerns don't matter.

For anyone who's interested, here is a YouTube video recently filmed locally, featuring landowners being crossed by the Tar Sands pipeline. It was sponsored by the Center for Energy Matters in Oklahama, and filmed beautifully by local filmmaker Stephen Marshall of Winnsboro.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QotpWw6AmFA

The oil alone is toxic! Let alone what they mix it with!

I don't want it here! >:[

Let me enlighten you just a bit. Your definition, no doubt colored by your political take on the EPA, is a bit incomplete. It is also the principle ingredient in lighter fluid and camp stove fuel.

And as for Napalm, here is the rest of the definition...

"The term napalm is a combination of the names of its derivatives (coprecipitated aluminum salts of naphthenic, and palmitic acids). The naphtha fraction of the crude oil raffination is oxidized and yields naphthenic acid."

Roger Gray

You are wrong. Naptha is NOT used to make Napalm and your efforts to misinform the public only stands in the way of jobs for Texans. Refineries will process this oil in Texas City and Port Arthur. The EPA is a rogue government agency which recently declared Carbon Dioxide a dangerous gas. It is a way to impose Cap and Trade taxes on Texans without congress's approval. Report the truth not the socialist agenda.

Charles, you should report to the doctor and tell him your meds are off again and you are talking crazy B.S. - "EPA rogue government agency"...wow you are really out and insult everyone's intelligence by such idiotic commentary. Please get your meds adjusted and go back into therapy and become a real human being for the first time since childhood. Good Luck With It!

Naptha is a petroleum distillate used in a variety of applications. Most of us know it as the cleaning fluid used at the dry cleaners. It is NOT used to produce Napalm.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napalm
As to the EPA statement that an environmental study is inadequate, Americans know that the EPA is a rogue government agency responsible for such foolish acts as declaring Carbon Dioxide a hazardous gas, a step to bypass congress and enact Cap and Trade taxes. Texans will get refinery jobs.

Post new Comment