First, its ACLU, not ACLJ. Second, the ACLU would not challenge the decision because the Supreme Court has made it clear that religious messages the unduly entangle the state in religion is unconstitutional. I suggest you read the Lee v. Weisman case for why coercion is an issue here and the Lemon v Kurtzman case for entanglement.
Regardless, there is no reason why the player have to run through a banner with a religious meaning to play the game.
logic September 19, 2012
at 4:13pm
First, its ACLU, not ACLJ. Second, the ACLU would not challenge the decision because the Supreme Court has made it clear that religious messages the unduly entangle the state in religion is unconstitutional. I suggest you read the Lee v. Weisman case for why coercion is an issue here and the Lemon v Kurtzman case for entanglement.
Regardless, there is no reason why the player have to run through a banner with a religious meaning to play the game.